Preparing Archive
progressive-estimation
Estimate AI-assisted and hybrid human+agent development work with research-backed PERT statistics and calibration feedback loops
Architectural Overview
"This module is grounded in ai engineering patterns and exposes 1 core capabilities across 1 execution phases."
Progressive Estimation
Estimate AI-assisted and hybrid human+agent development work using research-backed formulas with PERT statistics, confidence bands, and calibration feedback loops.
Overview
Progressive Estimation adapts to your team's working mode — human-only, hybrid, or agent-first — applying the right velocity model and multipliers for each. It produces statistical estimates rather than gut feelings.
When to Use This Skill
- Estimating development tasks where AI agents handle part of the work
- Sprint planning with hybrid human+agent teams
- Batch sizing a backlog (handles 5 or 500 issues)
- Staffing and capacity planning with agent multipliers
- Release date forecasting with confidence intervals
How It Works
- Mode Detection — Determines if the team works human-only, hybrid, or agent-first
- Task Classification — Categorizes by size (XS–XL), complexity, and risk
- Formula Application — Applies research-backed multipliers grounded in empirical studies
- PERT Calculation — Produces expected values using three-point estimation
- Confidence Bands — Generates P50, P75, P90 intervals
- Output Formatting — Formats for Linear, JIRA, ClickUp, GitHub Issues, Monday, or GitLab
- Calibration — Feeds back actuals to improve future estimates
Examples
Single task:
"Estimate building a REST API with authentication using Claude Code"
Batch mode:
"Estimate these 12 JIRA tickets for our next sprint"
With context:
"We have 3 developers using AI agents for ~60% of implementation. Estimate this feature."
Best Practices
- Start with a single task to calibrate before moving to batch mode
- Feed back actual completion times to improve the calibration system
- Use "instant mode" for quick T-shirt sizing without full PERT analysis
- Be explicit about team composition and agent usage percentage
Common Pitfalls
-
Problem: Overconfident estimates Solution: Use P75 or P90 for commitments, not P50
-
Problem: Missing context Solution: The skill asks clarifying questions — provide team size and agent usage
-
Problem: Stale calibration Solution: Re-calibrate when team composition or tooling changes significantly
Related Skills
@sprint-planning- Sprint planning and backlog management@project-management- General project management workflows@capacity-planning- Team velocity and capacity planning
Additional Resources
Primary Stack
TypeScript
Tooling Surface
Guide only
Workspace Path
.agents/skills/progressive-estimation
Operational Ecosystem
The complete hardware and software toolchain required.
Module Topology
Antigravity Core
Principal Engineering Agent
Recommended for this workflow
Adjacent modules that complement this skill surface
An error occurred. Please try again later.